![]() ![]() And that is where ELinks tries to come: colors in enabled consoles, some CSS positioning and even beginning of JavaScript / ECMAScript support. Many of them were realized in Links web browser, but then next shift in information visual presentation in web documents - from more of HTML to more of CSS - made new roads open even still keeping it to be in text mode. But with the time HTML and hardware moved forward, spread of scripting languages took place, the whole world of presenting, finding and consuming information advanced. Its authors conceived and realized a quite elaborate concept of web surfing in text mode with specific abstractions and conventions, which aided to overcome many restrictions and shortages of text-based surfing and created an experience, a world so definitely different from rapidly expanding graphical web. Lynx was and is a very mature software in its kind. The first course resulted into a Links version capable of displaying graphic content of web pages - Links2. There was a crossroad at the point when Links browser achieved certain level of completeness, surpassing in some areas then the most advanced text mode web browser, Lynx: to move forward into displaying graphics and further beyond pure text or to enhance text-based web surfing experience beyond boundaries reached first by Lynx and then Links browsers - but still keeping it in text mode. The success of the effort made it to be understood as "Extended" or "Enhanced". ![]() Aiming first to try and realize several features more or less weak / absent in Links. It started as a fork based on the code of Links browser. None of this is a replacement for real a11y testing most a11y technology leverages mainstream browsers (Chromium, FF, Safari, et cetera).ELinks is an effort to create an advanced text-based web browser. I test with pandoc's strict markdown output and make sure the resulting markdown is readable: If you want to go the extra mile and ensure that your website works with the most basic HTML parsers, try sending it through an HTML-to-Markdown converter that doesn't include inline html in the Markdown output. Originally written for blind users, it's great for sighted users as well. With the exception of a few whitespace characters, their output of both seems to be identical.Įdbrowse is a line-mode browser that supports JavaScript via Duktape. Mozilla's Readability is written in JS these tools are written in C and Go, respectively. I also like to diff my website's HTML against the HTML output of these tools, just to see how much extraneous HTML I have. Testing in these ensures that your website will work in Firefox's Reader Mode. Pipe that into w3m/lynx/links to read articles in the terminal. Rdrview, go-readability: these are CLI utilities that use Mozilla's Readability algorithm to send HTML of just the article to stdout. Oh, hello there again! It's always good to see people testing their site on non-mainstream user-agents. That is how I think of users who use the popular graphical browsers, waiting arbitray amounts of time on every website for pages to "load", making dozens of unnecessary connections to third party servers. Funny how he calls anyone who would use a text-only browser exclusively a "masochist". Of course, this is not a topic anyone really cares about. I would love to do a side-by-side comparison of text-only browsers. (this is what initially hoookd me on links) and 2. To answer your question, the two biggest reasons I would always choose links over lynx is 1. It makes me think they do not actually use a text-only browser much (e.g., once in a while), and that they have not tried them all. It baffles me when people recommend lynx today. ![]() I used lynx through a public access UNIX system for some years. As an internet user beginning the late 80's, I always tried every linemode or text-only browser I heard about. It is my primary browser for recreational web use. ![]() Bias disclosure: I have been a links user for over 20 years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |